COUNTERKNOWLEDGE DAMIAN THOMPSON PDF
For Damian Thompson, the misinformation industry is wreaking havoc on theories and spurious claims are forms of “counterknowledge,” and. For Damian Thompson, these unproven theories and spurious claims are forms of ‘counterknowledge’, and, helped by the internet, they are creating a global. Damian Thompson has invented a new word for this – “counterknowledge” – and has tried to give the whole flabby concept a bit of shape.
Author: | Fenrikasa Malatilar |
Country: | Central African Republic |
Language: | English (Spanish) |
Genre: | Science |
Published (Last): | 2 December 2006 |
Pages: | 91 |
PDF File Size: | 1.62 Mb |
ePub File Size: | 17.49 Mb |
ISBN: | 591-6-80408-325-6 |
Downloads: | 28722 |
Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
Uploader: | Yozshura |
In Januarythe parents of 24, children in Pakistan refused to let health workers vaccinate their children because radical mullahs had told them the same idiotic thonpson.
In the dakian, the most useful part of this book was the “Further Reading” section that concludes it. Responses to the report have not yet been published, but in any case its description as the solution of a mystery see for example http: In fact not only is no argument needed, but none is wanted.
Counterknowledge – Wikipedia
When the conspiracy theorist’s mouth opens, out come not sentences but symptoms. For instance, Thompson claims that “Islamic Creationism is turning into a serious problem for british sixth-form colleges and universities”, but fails to substantiate this thompsoh with anything but the flimsiest of anecdotal evidence.
More people are falling prey to these tricks, making them rich and, thus, further encouraging more of the same. English Choose a language for shopping.
If Thompson really espouses the best of enlightenment values, he should heed the words of Immanual Kant: A book about facts and reason should probably not rely so much on logical fallacies, faulty premises, and ad hominem attac Do yourself a favour and don’t bother with this book.
It does not fit the stereotype of the shady peddlers of counterknowledge. One of the problems he does stress is how respectable newspapers and book counterknkwledge are sucked in to purveying this sort of bilge to the gullible public.
Of course some people are genuinely fooled by quack remedies, which thompskn rarely dangerous may lead them to forego more effective treatments.
To adapt the old Scientology slogan: If he were to use argument and not vilification as the way to address these issues, perhaps he could lay some claim to counterkmowledge enlightenment.
I don’t think he wrote this book to convert anyone; I think he wrote it to be a quick read to raise awareness to a growing problem: Without sounding anti-Islamic, he rightly states that Islamic studies desperately need an ‘enlightenment’ – since some of the misconceptions held by their scholars are quite startling.
Christine Boutin, the housing minister, when asked in an interview whether she thought Bush might have been behind the attacks, said: With this hasty addendum, which seems opposed to the description they have just given of a disconnected collection of people, they reassert their almost superstitious cultic?
How else are we supposed to make decisions at the ballot box?
Follow the Author
Why We Believe Conspiracy Theories. But from a purely pragmatic point of view of persuading the reader, Thompson would be more effective if he didn’t wax quite so white-hot indignant about each and every example he cites.
We are being counterknowkedge with dangerous nonsense. AmazonGlobal Ship Orders Internationally. This is concerned at most with what we are in a position to know or to be sure of rather than what is true or coumterknowledge.
Sometimes it comes across almost as an ironic conspiracy theory as when he ascribes some counterknowledge success I think more with incredulity at avertible disaster than admiration at elite conspiracy effectively to coordination between authors, media, and publishing houses all hoping to get their share of a profitable pie.
Questions?
Also, by choosing to attack only the most low-hanging fruit of the beliefs of fringe elements, the author provides no insight into more insidious and less obviously false counterknowledge. Nor has intuition or beginner’s luck enabled him to stumble on some profound truth. This immaturity is self-imposed when its cause lies not in lack of understanding, but in lack of resolve and courage to use it without guidance from another.
An explanation for this is readily available.
Sign up to our Frontpage news email. Governments have used popular historical fi This book was not too bad, but could have been better. Indeed, the newspaper story is the only source cited: First, only some forms of creationism deny the theory of evolution.
This is an angry, brilliant rant on the growing culture of misinformation. The book is only pages long so it’s a fast read. Perhaps countetknowledge is supposed to cover only claims and beliefs that conflict with science and certain other areas of academic research such counterkjowledge history, which supposedly share a common or analogous methodology.
Has someone bored you rigid at a dinner party by unveiling one of these “secrets”?